Monthly Archives: February 2007

"You're An Expository Preacher? Ohhh!" Part IV

You Take the Scriptures as a Whole Rather Than as Fodder for Prooftexts

Therefore I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of all of you, for I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole counsel of God. Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood (Acts 20:26-28, ESV).

Pastor Topica sits in his office on Monday morning contemplating about the following Sunday. He is a Southern Baptist pastor, which means that he will likely have a special emphasis Sunday. New Year’s, Racial Reconciliation Sunday, Sanctity of Life Sunday, Missions Emphases, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Labor Day, Seminary Appreciation Sunday, and the list goes on. This Sunday happens to be Sanctity of Life Sunday.

Being a faithful follower of Christ, he also holds strongly to the sanctity of life. He believes we should defend the unborn, that embryonic stem cell research should not be an option, that we should take care of the elderly — and its something he feels passionately about. He has a tremendous message.

Now all he needs are the Scriptures to support the message.

Granted, this is an exaggerated case — or is it? It reminds me of the one-box cartoon where the preacher is in his study who prays, “Lord, please give me a message to go with this great illustration!” How often do ministers all over the world sit in their study with a passion for a particular topic — and use the Scriptures simply to mine out Scriptures as fodder for prooftexts to give ‘support’ to their message.

Is there anything inherently wrong with this method? Am I saying that anyone who does this on a regular basis is immoral and unfit for the pulpit ministry?

Uh … no.

What I am asking is that the Scriptures be the springboard of our sermons rather than our pet topic being the springboard, relegating the Scriptures as simply the fodder to propel our agenda.

Soon, we will look at ways to spot whether you are guilty of this, and provide some helpful tools to turn the ship around in the right direction.

Categories: preaching, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why Bother Going to Church? One Gifted Author Explains

Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful. And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.

(Anonymous, The Letter to the Hebrews from The Holy Bible, Hebrews 10:19-25, ESV).

Categories: Church Life | Leave a comment

How to End a Super Bowl Right

pic14465.jpg

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is The Lord's Work Marvelous in Your Eyes? (Psalm 118)

This is a typical Wednesday night Bible study. Tonight is on Psalm 118 as we are going through each of the Psalms on Wednesday night. We started with the Psalms in September of 2003. We only have 32 left (but Psalm 119 is next!).

May God bless you with His Word as He does me!

====

This is the Lord’s Doing
Psalm 118
Wednesday, February 7, 2007

How blessed it is to see a Psalm that declares God’s goodness in the midst of the world’s wickedness.

1. His steadfast love is the Lord’s doing (Psalm 118:1-4);

Psalm 118:1-4
Oh give thanks to the Lord, for he is good;
for his steadfast love endures forever!
[2] Let Israel say,
“His steadfast love endures forever.”
[3] Let the house of Aaron say,
“His steadfast love endures forever.”
[4] Let those who fear the Lord say,
“His steadfast love endures forever.”

Do you get the idea that God is trying to reinforce the notion of “his steadfast love” enduring forever? Good. He tells the ethnic children of Abraham (Israel), the priesthood who represent and intercede for us to God to know this, and for all those truly faithful who fear him to know this. In a world where the only thing that stays the same is change, it is good to know that the one who made the world and is over the world never changes.

William Gladstone, in announcing the death of Princess Alice to the House of Commons, told a touching story. The little daughter of the Princess was seriously ill with diphtheria. The doctors told the princess not to kiss her little daughter and endanger her life by breathing the child’s breath. Once when the child was struggling to breathe, the mother, forgetting herself entirely, took the little one into her arms to keep her from choking to death. Rasping and struggling for her life, the child said, “Momma, kiss me!” Without thinking of herself the mother tenderly kissed her daughter. She got diphtheria and some days thereafter she went to be forever with the Lord. Real love forgets self. Real love knows no danger. Real love doesn’t count the cost. The Bible says, “Many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it.”

This is the type of love we need to understand from the lord — many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it.

2. Our deliverance is the Lord’s doing (Psalm 118:5-13);

Verses five through seven say:

Psalm 118:5-7
Out of my distress I called on the Lord;
the Lord answered me and set me free.
[6] The Lord is on my side; I will not fear.
What can man do to me?
[7] The Lord is on my side as my helper;
I shall look in triumph on those who hate me.

When God is on your side, there is the knowledge that God hears you in your distress. Not only does God hear, he answers. And not only does God answer, he gives us liberty. He gives us strength because we know that we have an advocate who stands with us. 1 John 2:1-3 tells us:

My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world. And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments.

He stands with us as our aid and comfort against the enemy. We look to the Lord in triumph when we trust.

For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world— our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God (1 John 5:4-5, ESV)?

This is the victory that is ours — and that victory is the Lord’s doing.

3. Our salvation is the Lord’s doing (Psalm 118:14-18).

a. He puts a song in our heart (14-16)

Again, this Psalmist notes how God is his help in saying God is his strength. The inner strength given puts for an outward song — but it is not a song that everyone can sing. This is a song found only “in the tents of the righteous.” I cannot help of thinking of that old Larry Norman song:

When you know a pretty story, you don’t let it go un-said.
Look around you, as you sing it, there are people everywhere,
You tell it to your children as you tuck them into bed.
And to those who stop to listen, this sweet song becomes a prayer.

And when you know a wonderful secret, you tell it to your friends.
Cause when you know a wonderful secret, you tell it to your friends.
Because a lifetime filled with happiness, is like a street that never ends.
Tell them that a life time filled with jesus, is like a street that never
ends.
Sing that sweet sweet song of salvation. let your laughter fill the air
Sing that sweet sweet song of salvtion, tell the people everywhere.
Sing that sweet sweet song of salvation, to every man every na – tion
Sing that sweet sweet song of salvation, and let the people know that Jesus cares.

b. He puts to mind all his wondrous deeds (17)
c. He punishes and disciplines for our good (Hebrews 12:5b-12).

4. The opened gate of righteousness is the Lord’s doing (Psalms 118:19-25).

If ever a case could be made that this is a Christian psalm, it is because of this section. After recognizing that only God can “open to me the gates of righteousness” (118:19), verse 22 is oh so familiar: “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone” (118:22). This ‘stone’ in the original context applies to Israel, since its land and population were so small and seemingly insignificant. Yet Deut. 7:7-8 tells us:

It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the Lord set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, [8] but it is because the Lord loves you and is keeping the oath that he swore to your fathers, that the Lord has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

God chose to use what the world deemed small and insignificant to do his work in his world. He does the same in the church, yes?

For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. [26] For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. [27] But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; [28] God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, [29] so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. [30] He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, whom God made our wisdom and our righteousness and sanctification and redemption. [31] Therefore, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 1:25-31, ESV)

Jesus used this verse in the Parable of the Vineyard (Matthew 21:42), Peter used it to defend their work before the Sanhedrin in Acts 4:7 and used it to speak of the church in 1 Peter 2:4-10. The rejection of the “stone” for Jesus and the apostles were the Pharisees. Yet it was the Lord’s doing to lift up what the world rejected for his glory. The world rejected Jesus by crucifying him and leaving him in that tomb. Yet, God made him the cornerstone by lifting him up to build his church. “This is the day that the Lord has made; let us rejoice and be glad it in” (Psalm 118:24). No wonder the early church fathers used this text for numerous Easter sermons!

5. The light that shines on his people is the Lord’s doing (Psalm 118:26-29).

Recognize verse 26? They shouted this to Jesus in his triumphal entry (Mark 11:9). Hosanna means “save us” which connects with verse 25. When God shines his light, he is shining his favor upon us. This results in salvation and results in a determined worship before him.

The Lord is God,
and he has made his light to shine upon us.
Bind the festal sacrifice with cords,
up to the horns of the altar (Psalm 118:27, ESV).

When God shines his favor, worship ensues!! Think of how a holy God could ever look upon his people with any pleasure at all — but he does. But now we no longer need to offer sacrifices of bulls and goats in worship. Christ has already made that sacrifice for us once and for all (Hebrews 9:23-28). So now we sacrifice a broken and contrite heart (Psalm 51:17), and we bring forth the sacrifice of praise (Hebrews 13:15), and most of all a sacrifice of our lives (Romans 12:1).

Conclusion

In verse 23, we read, “This is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes.” Do we look at the works and the Word of the Lord and say, “This is marvelous!”? “Delight yourself in the LORD and he will give you the desires of your heart” (Psalm 37:4). We delight in God’s nature, God’s work, and God’s work. He has done marvelous things (Psalm 98:1).

Categories: sermons | Leave a comment

Dungy Wins Super Bowl "The Lord's Way"

dungy_1.jpgWhatever you may think of the Indianapolis Colts, you cannot help but think highly of their coach, Tony Dungy. After taking over the reigns of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 1993, he turned them into winners in a rather strange way by NFL standards. He did so without screaming and cursing and berating.

During the Super Bowl, Jim Nantz and Phil Simms of CBS noted that at the beginning of training camp, Dungy told his players in a very calm voice, “I hope all of you are listening, because this is as loudly as I will talk all season.” They went on to note that while players in the NFL play for their coaches out of fear, the Colts (and the Bucs from before) played for Dungy out of respect — afraid to let him down.

ChristianityToday.com has an excellent article entitled “Dungy Makes Super Bowl History ‘The Lord’s Way’.” Here is how it begins:

Indianapolis Colts’ Tony Dungy made history as the first black coach ever to win the Super Bowl. And taking advantage of the trophy stage, Dungy was more proud to have won the big game “the Lord’s way.”

“I’m proud to be the first African-American coach to win this,” said Dungy during the trophy ceremony Sunday night, according to the Associated Press. “But again, more than anything, Lovie Smith and I are not only African-American but also Christian coaches, showing you can do it the Lord’s way. We’re more proud of that.”

The Colts beat the Chicago Bears 29-17 on a soggy field in Miami, Fla., Sunday. They did it for their coach, whom the players say deserved the win. And Dungy did it without yelling or cursing from the sidelines – a trait that his players have trained with and that opposing coach and close friend Lovie Smith picked up when he assisted Dungy on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ coaching staff.

A day ahead of the game, Dungy headlined the annual faith-based Super Bowl Breakfast, hosted by Athletes in Action. A record crowd of 2,500 people witnessed Dungy speak as the first-ever Super Bowl Coach to appear in person at the breakfast a day before NFL’s marquee game.

Dungy truly lives what he believes and it translates fully into his work environment. Just ask his past players.  So I may not be a big Colts fan — I am a big Tony Dungy fan.  He puts Christ before all else.

Categories: Sports | 1 Comment

Known as a "Lottery Church"? (From PreachingNow, 2.6.07)

An AgapePress story by Mark Creech details a new challenge for churches: members who win lotteries and then want to donate a portion of their winnings, despite the church’s outspoken opposition to gambling. Creech relates: “Pastor Scott Thomas understands this principle well. According to Family News In Focus, he faced a very difficult situation several years ago when a deacon in his church offered a portion of lottery winnings for a building fund. Thomas refused the gift and stood on the principle of Christian separation. ‘I’ve just always believed that God doesn’t need to use chance to build his Church,’ said Thomas. Furthermore, he added that impoverished people largely play lotteries and the church shouldn’t profit on the backs of the poor.

“Despite Thomas’ opposition, however, the church wanted the money and fired him. They accepted the gift and built the building. As a result, attendance has dropped from 165 to fewer than 50 people a week. Thomas says: ‘Several of the members have called me and said, ‘The albatross around our necks is that we are now known as the lottery church.'”

Pastor John Piper wrote, “Don’t play the lottery for me. We are followers of Jesus. He had no place to lay His head and did not accept the demonic temptation to jump off the temple for the jackpot of instant recognition. The Calvary road is not paved with Powerball tickets, but with blood. Don’t play the lottery for Bethlehem Baptist Church. We will not, I pray, salve your conscience by taking one dime of your plunder, or supporting even the thought of your spiritual suicide. Let the widow give her penny and the laborer his wage. And keep your life free from the love of money.” (Click here to read the full story.)

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/2/122003mc.asp

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Former Mormon Warns Fellow Christians About Supporting Romney's Bid for President (OneNewsNow.com)

Mitt Romney, (R-Mass.)A one-time Mormon says anyone thinking about supporting presidential hopeful Mitt Romney — a Mormon — in his White House campaign needs to be aware of what distinguishes that religious group’s beliefs from Christianity.

A woman whose father was a bishop in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) and who is a former Mormon herself says Christians considering Mormon candidate Mitt Romney’s bid for the U.S. presidency need to be reminded about the differences between Mormonism and biblical Christianity.

(To read the rest of Chad Groenig’s article from 2.5.2007, click here.)

What do you think?  Does a man’s spiritual beliefs play any role in how you vote?  Do you think they will play a major role in how they govern?  Does Romney’s Mormonism concern you or comfort you in his bid?

Categories: politics | 4 Comments

Tremper Longman's "Making Sense of the Old Testament: Three Crucial Questions": A Book Review

b520.gifTremper Longman, III, serves as the Robert H. Gundry Professor of Biblical Studies and the chair of the religious studies department at Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California. He is the author of numerous books and commentaries, including Introduction to the Old Testament.

This volume is part of the 3 Crucial Questions series edited by Grant R. Osbourne and Richard J. Jones. Longman states, “It is vitally important for us to work at our appreciation and understanding to the Old Testament” (11). His hope is that this work will “help revive in the reader a sense of the importance of the Old Testament for Christian faith and practice” (12). Longman desires to help the interpreter of the Old Testament confront the obstacles before him.

Summary

Longman’s volume contains three chapters. Chapter One gives various keys to understanding the Old Testament. He provides an overview of the study of the Old Testament and outlines the attractions and obstacles found therein. Longman outlines how God communicates his revelation to us: God — human author — biblical text — first readers — present-day readers. With this paradigm in place, Longman recommends some principles for successful interpretation. The first principle is to discover the author’s intended meaning. The second principle is to “read Scripture in its context” (32) — which he calls the “most basic of all principles in reading literature” (32). Longman notes, “God chose to communicate his revelation to us in literary forms that we recognize from other written works” (32). The third principle is to “identify the genre of the book and passage” (39). Principle four is to “consider the historical and cultural background of the Bible” (47) while principle five urges the interpreter to “consider the grammar and structure within the passage” (48). Principle six tells the interpreter to “interpret experience in the light of Scripture, not Scripture in the light of experience” (50). Longman’s seventh interpretive principle is to “always seek the full counsel of Scripture” (51). He notes here that “the most important ideas in the Bible are stated hundreds of times,” and that we must “determine the meaning of the unclear verse by examining the clear teaching of Scripture” (51). Principle eight states, “Discover how the Scripture passage presents Jesus Christ” (51) and principle nine concludes this section by advising the interpreter to “be open-minded and tolerant of other interpretations” (53).

Longman’s aim in chapter 2 (“Is the God of the Old Testament also the God of the New Testament?”) is to answer the false Old Testament stereotypes plaguing Christians by showing the intricate unity of the Testaments. These stereotypes consist of how they perceive the different portrayals of God in each of the Testaments. Longman shows how God is the center of both the Old and New Testaments, the “obvious answer” (59) to what the Bible is about. Longman notes that “God is presented in the concreteness of vivid similes and metaphors [that] arise out of everyday experience” (59) and occur in “distinct phases” (86). The relationships that God possesses with his people as their covenant king of the Old Testament with Jesus Christ fulfilling that covenant. He also serves as our divine warrior, which shows “strong continuity as we move from the holy wars of Yahweh to the spiritual warfare of Jesus and then finally to the climactic battles associated with the second coming of Christ and the fuller judgment” (71).

Chapter Three deals with the practical issues of the Old Testament on the Christian life. He cites two different realms of thinking on this matter: that of dispensationalism and theonomy. Dispensationalism is defined as when God worked in the Old Testament through the law and the New Testament through grace. Theonomy argues that “the Old Testament laws and penalties are still in effect today” (105). Longman spends a considerable amount of time discussing the law in the Old Testament. The reasons are twofold. First, “the law provides the most obvious answers to the question under consideration” (123). Secondly, he notes that “it is not immediately clear … exactly how the Christian relates to the law today” (123). Longman systematically addresses each genre of the Old Testament and takes the interpreter step-by-step through extracting principles to apply to the Christian life.

Critical Analysis

Longman expertly exposes the commonalities of the Old Testament and New Testament while dealing honestly and directly with the main obstacles and issues arising from critics who see no connection. His prayer was that his words “will give help to those who struggle with the proper interpretation of the oldest portions of God’s written revelation to his human creatures” (12). Even though Longman gives a lot of ground in his dialogue with these various critics, he does succeed in presenting some good principles for solid interpretation.

The reader will appreciate how Longman addresses not only ways to overcome the obstacles, but he presents the various obstacles in an objective and forthright manner. This type of understanding from a scholar with Longman’s credentials will connect with any reader regardless of their biblical or theological training. For instance, in Chapter 1 he mentions four different obstacles Christians must overcome when interpreting Old Testament literature: “(1) its length, (2) its antiquity, (3) its foreignness, and (4) its place in the history of God’s redemption (18).” In Chapter 2, he deals with “false stereotypes” projected on God’s character on how God exacts justice and the immediacy of his judgments on Gentiles and Jews. “The judgment, exclusion, and harshness of the Old Testament are contrasted with the salvation, inclusion, and compassion of the New” (56). Since Longman presents these critical and skeptical views with such candor, directness, and honesty, he certainly invites those same critics and skeptics to understand his case as he seems to understand theirs.

Longman also provides a rather chapter that is pastoral in nature in Chapter 3 on “How is the Christian to Apply the Old Testament to Life?” Longman is not content merely to stay within the realms of history, exegesis, and hermeneutics. He now deals with the average layperson in the average church who sits under weekly preaching waiting to hear a word from God. He deals squarely with whether the Old Testament is relevant, identifying two extreme schools of thought that plague our churches (theonomy and dispensationalism). While the layperson may not be able to define, he certainly understands the concept. He makes a valiant attempt to forego trite answers in order to honestly and directly deal with their questions.

Longman rightly notes that an obstacle for Christians in reading the Old Testament is the translation they read. His conclusions however present problems for the expository preacher. He laments:

The literal, stilted, and sometimes archaic language which is used in the majority of English translations does not reflect the literary power of the original Hebrew stories and poems. The false notion that literal is more accurate, or that religious language must sound like Shakespearean English, has led to the production of English Bibles that are tedious to read (19).

He seems to assess blame toward literal translations for hindering “sustained reading of large portions of Scripture” (19). What is puzzling is when he notes the first principle for successful interpretation is to “discover the author’s intended meaning” (23), how does he expect a layman to discover this when he disparages literal translations’? He falsely (and possibly unintentionally) equates accuracy with language that is Shakespearean and ‘high’ in nature — an unnecessary connection. If Longman truly desires for the preacher and interpreter to know the intended meaning of the author, then he should remain consistent in this mindset by advocating, not disparaging, literal translations.

How Longman concludes Chapter 1 presents another weakness. In his ninth principle of interpretation, he exhorts the interpreter to “be open-minded and tolerant of other interpretations” (53). While in this postmodern age where truth and meaning are deemed relative to the individual, he then asks a bevy of rhetorical questions which, within the context of this section, he seems to categorize as teachings with “fuzzy edges [on] what the Bible leaves unclear” (54). These rhetorical questions address the creation account, the historicity of Jonah, the conditions of divorce, glossolalia, ordination of women into the ministry — among others. He notes that while we must study them and adopt positions, “we must acknowledge that God in his wisdom has not made the answers clear in his Word [as well as] embrace those with whom we disagree and carry on our discussions with them in the rich love of Christian fellowship” (54). Longman draws a rather disturbing line, for some who question the historicity of Jonah, given that Christ testified of his historical presence would have trouble fellowshipping with someone who denied the clear Word of God in general and Jesus’ account specifically. The same could be said of ordination of women into the ministry. Longman would have made his case quite well had he not included those rhetorical questions. Expositional preachers would and should take issue with anyone who questions the veracity of Scripture.

Conclusion

While this book brings a helpful contribution to the study of literary forms and excels in confronting faulty notions concerning biblical interpretation, as a pastor I would hesitate giving this book to a novice studying Old Testament literary forms. Longman gives too much ground and validity to his critics. This would result many beginning students in our churches to stumble in their understanding and trust of Old Testament Scripture. While the pastor and seminarian would be discerning enough to spot these problems, Longman misses the mark with his aim to the average Christian.

———————

Longman, III, Tremper. Making Sense of the Old Testament: Three Crucial Questions. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998. 154 pp. $16.99.

Categories: Book Review | Leave a comment

Submissive Hearts, Submissive Homes – Part I: The Heart of a Godly Wife (Ephesians 5:22-24)

Thank you so much for your prayers while we were in Trinidad. God not only did some good work through us (glory to His name) but He also did some very good things in each of us — things that will take some time for all of us to process.

I had one very interesting conversation with one of the elderly women in the church. Her name is Curlita Nickles and is one of the nicest and most direct people you’d ever meet. I first met her when we did VBS in 2004. We were trying to do some games with the youth, and they were bored. When we ran out of ideas, she would see us and pull me aside and say, “Pastor Perry, you must keep them busy! Keep them active.” But she said it in such a sweet way, you couldn’t get defensive.

Well, I had another conversation with her about something that you would not hear of much in the states. I was scraping off some of the dried cement from around the tiles. I had reached a point where the residue had accumulated so badly that I needed to get the broom and dustpan and sweep. She walked by and we began talking while I was sweeping. I was having trouble in the corners, and she politely said, “Pastor, let me do that — dis sweepin’ is a ladies’ t’ing.” I said, “Well, thank you. You know, I don’t hear that much in the states about something being a ‘ladies thing’.” She said, “Yes, I know, but some things a man should do, and some things a lady should do — and this is a ladies’ thing.”

Why did that conversation strike me so strangely? Maybe because in 21st century America, we don’t hear much about something being for a man or for a woman — the boundaries are not only being blurred, but they are actively being either redrawn or done away with altogether. In fact, the very notion that there are roles designed by God for men and women is met with not only general disagreement but outright belligerence. One of my former youth even said to me that anyone who believes in that is simply threatened by a strong woman trying to make something of her life.

This morning, we begin a series on Submissive Homes, Submissive Hearts. The very notion of submission goes against the grain of our flesh and our culture even now.


1. Before women can submit to their husbands, they must first submit to the Lord.

Ephesians 5:22 tells wives to “submit to their husbands as unto the Lord.” This is not to say that they should view their husbands in the same way as Jesus Christ. The Son of God (God the Son) is holy, sinless, and spotless. All worship and devotion are his. Husbands, as many of you ladies are well aware, have many flaws. As much as many unmarried people are looking for the perfect spouse — they do not exist because no one is perfect.

What this is saying is that in order for this command to make any sense at all, one must be submitted first to the Lord in worship. Remember from two weeks ago we looked at what it meant to be filled with the Spirit. Remember the last point? “We must be unabashed in our worship before God and men.” We are to be sober-minded as we desire to see what God’s will is as well as being ones who speak the psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, giving thanks to God for everything — and notice the last one: submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ. We cannot submit to one another if we fail to revere what Christ has revealed about himself and his will in his word.

Yet the rise of the feminist agenda as with every other agenda that sets itself against the things of God in our country has truly sought to undermine this mindset by first undermining the Word. This is always the slide to liberalism — denying the authority and sufficiency of the Word of God.

Women in our culture resent submitting to anyone in the home or at work. As a result, the feminist movement arose and blamed not only the men who had these character flaws, but the institutions of marriage and family themselves! Janet Richards declares that

Feminism is in its nature radical . . . . It is the social institutions of which we complain primarily . . . . If you consider the past there is no doubt at all that the whole structure of society was designed to keep women entirely in the power of men.”

This is paranoid at best, but dangerous at worst, in my opinion. Be that as it may, feminist Roxanne Dunbar said it plainly:

“Ultimately, we want to destroy the three pillars of class and caste [i.e., sexist] society—the family, private property, and the state.”

So it is no wonder that because men have misused the Word and women have been the recipients of this disobedience for so long that divorce is now seen as a viable option to an outdated institution.

Are they right when they say that divorce is a viable option to come out of an outdated institution like marriage? Are they right when they say that the leadership in the home should be shared and that men being head of the home is “tyrannical and barbaric”? Are they right when they say that husbands and wives should share the ‘breadwinning’ duties? Are they right when they say the idea of wives/moms being as Titus 2:4-5 says, “Keepers at home” an archaic notion to suppress their possible contributions in the marketplace?

Let’s ask other questions: why is the church so silent on these matters? We want to much to help people grow spiritually, yet we do not speak on areas that God clearly outlines because we are, like the Pharisees of old, afraid of the backlash not just from the culture, but also from Christians who have gradually and slowly bought into the lie.

You see what has happened, in my opinion, that this bad ideology (anything that undermines God’s Word is ‘bad’) rose up because so many Christians were engaged in bad Christianity. Husbands began to submit to the idea that they were to be rulers and tyrants and, thus, saw their wives simply as short-order cooks, doormats, sex objects, and even as one of their own children. They submitted to a false Christianity rather than to the true Christ of Christianity. It’s no wonder that women who had been subjected to this began to revolt — if I were them, I would have too.

Yet the problem is not with the Bible or the institutions themselves, it is with the sinfulness in all of us. Men began to be selfish rather than submissive to the Lord Jesus and always will be. Now women are having more of a forum to be selfish rather than submissive to the worship, word, and will of God.

2. When women are submissive, you serve as a witness to your husband.

Here, we turn to 1 Peter 3:1-7. The totality of God’s Word gives us a clear picture of God’s design in creation as well as God’s design for the home. In 1 Peter 3:1-2 we read:

Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives— when they see your respectful and pure conduct.

Notice what is happening here. God has called wives to be subject to their own husbands (again, not men in general, but their own husbands). Why? In the area of God’s design and the roles that he has given both men and women, in this case the women have been empowered by God to be humble for the purpose of being a witness in the home. We may not see it this way, but this is where we also have to submit to the Lord and trust his ways.

How are wives able to be witnesses in the home?

First, I see a witness of encouragement to the Christian husband. Again, we’ve established that all of us have been tarnished by the fall and are subject to sin. And all of us need encouragement in our Christian walk, don’t we? For this, we usually quote from Hebrews 10:24-25 which says:

And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.

So in these verses, we see that the body of Christ is to stir up one another to love and good works, to meet together for worship so we may encourage one another until Christ comes. Sadly, though, we only think about church services for this, don’t we? And how often are those? One, two, maybe three hours a week.

Yet the church services end, but where may the majority of ministry be done? Between a husband and wife in the home. Wives, as the part of the church of Jesus Christ, we are to encourage one another to be obedient — and that counts for your husbands, too! Are you encouraging in your comments and in your actions? Proverbs 27:15 says, “A continual dripping on a rainy day and a quarrelsome wife are alike.” Do you communicate that you love him and want God’s best for him in good times and in bad?

Second, I see a witness of evangelism to the unsaved husband. Living a Christ-like live in the world outside is difficult. Living a Christ-like life in a home where your spouse does not share the same love for Christ is like living in a cauldron. This is why I always advise Christian high school and college students not to date non-Christians. No matter how much you may seem to have in common and how well you get along, if you don’t share Christ, you share nothing. Paul advises even for us not to yoke ourselves to unbelievers (2 Corinthians 6:14). Why? I believe that one of you will have to put something on the outside in order for the marriage to remain in harmony. The unbeliever will either have to put himself outside and Christ first (unlikely to happen), or the believer will have to put Christ on the outside in order to keep the peace (which is what often happens).

Yet if you live in a Christ-like manner before your unbelieving husband, he may not like it or approve. He may mock you and make fun of you, but it will make a difference. Notice 1 Peter 3:14-16:

But even if you should suffer for righteousness’ sake, you will be blessed. Have no fear of them, nor be troubled, [15] but in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; [16] yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame.

This brings us to another type of witness: godly behavior. Let’s read 1 Peter 3:3-6:

Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair, the wearing of gold, or the putting on of clothing— [4] but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God’s sight is very precious. [5] For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their husbands, [6] as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. And you are her children, if you do good and do not fear anything that is frightening.

Verse 5 says that holy women adorned themselves by submitting to their husbands because of their hope in God. They did not rely on the latest fashions to define who they are. They were known by their godliness, not their goldliness. And women who are out to catch the attention of a man too often do so with skin-tight, flesh-revealing attire that does not communicate godliness at all. The internal beauty of a heart given over to the things of God and to the will and worship and the Word of God speaks more than any external trimmings.

Categories: culture, sermons | 2 Comments

Want a Different Take on New Year's Resolutions? Heeere's Rhett and Link!

New Year’s Resolution Show

Categories: Uncategorized | 2 Comments